News Detail back to listing
The fallout from the controversial judgment in F v H
- Jan 18, 2021
- Latest News
How the family justice system is failing victims of abuse and children who are at real risk of harm as a result of a flawed approach to cases involving allegations of abuse and coercive and controlling behaviour
On Tuesday, four appeals in private children proceedings involving allegations of coercive and controlling behaviour and serious sexual assault have been conjoined to be heard in the Court of Appeal. other parties have been joined to the proceedings including CAFCASS, Women’s Aid and Families Need Fathers to voice their views and concerns on the issues that are to be raised.
The appeal is of monumental importance, providing an opportunity for the family justice system to take a comprehensive and uncomfortable look at how it is failing victims of abuse and children who are at real risk of harm as a result of a flawed approach to cases involving allegations of abuse and coercive and controlling behaviour. At the same time, the Court must also explore how these cases are being managed and tried for those who are responding to such allegations, particularly in light of the lack of access to legal representation due to unaffordability and unavailability of legal aid.
The appeal recognises what many practitioners, litigants and even the wider public know to be the case; the current system is not fit for purpose. Public confidence in the process is at rock bottom and litigants on both sides of the fence do not consider that justice is being done. The appeal offers a chance for a radical change of approach and an opportunity for the family justice system to set a new standard about how these cases are handled. Momentum for reform has been building for some time but it remains to be seen whether the appeal will offer the silver bullet that is sought.
Is this the moment for a “congruence of approach” between family and criminal law, with the adoption of practice and procedure already established in the criminal courts? Or should children be invited to have their voice heard in such proceedings? We do not know yet what the answer is, and it is unlikely that this appeal on its own will make the difference that is needed. At the very least, the future must involve uniformity of case management in family proceedings across the judicial spectrum and better training and guidance for the professionals involved to minimise the risk of decisions being made that might perpetuate harm for children.